Configuration packages for software products

ABSTRACT

A configuration package receives user-generated input that configures a decision service to generate decision data. The configuration package includes artifacts and the user-generated input selects the artifacts from an artifact library in a configuration database. A configured decision service is generated, where the generating includes receiving, by a decision service factory, the configuration package. Also, the decision service factory receives a decision template including configurable decision elements and non-configurable decision elements. Further, the decision service factory receives a user configuration specifying a parameter in the corresponding artifact. The artifact from the configuration package, the user configuration and the decision template are combined to generate the configured decision service. The configured decision service receives, from a client computer, input for each of the configurable decision elements. Based on the received input, the decision data is generated by the configured decision service. The generated decision data is transmitted to the client computer.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The current application is a Continuation of and claims priority to U.S.application Ser. No. 14/940,133, filed on Nov. 12, 2015, which in turnclaims priority to Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/078,325 filedNov. 11, 2014, the contents of which are hereby incorporated byreference herein in their entirety.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The subject matter described herein relates to configuration software,for example configuring pre-compiled code frameworks.

BACKGROUND

Software is frequently sold or distributed as pre-compiled computerproducts that may be restricted by, platform, language, etc. Softwareshared from user to user and for a wide variety of applications oftenneeds customization to either be of use to the particular user or to beused on a particular machine, often involving the re-writing of code.The re-writing of code can result in variations in functionality oroutput as well as being difficult or impossible for the end-user.

SUMMARY

In one aspect, a configuration package stored on a computer memory andaccessible by one or more processors, receives user-generated input thatconfigures a decision service to generate decision data. Theconfiguration package includes artifacts and the user-generated inputselects the artifacts from an artifact library in a configurationdatabase.

A configured decision service is generated, where the generatingincludes receiving, by a decision service factory, the configurationpackage. Also, the decision service factory receives a decision templateincluding configurable decision elements and non-configurable decisionelements. Further, the decision service factory receives a userconfiguration specifying a parameter in the corresponding artifact. Theartifact from the configuration package, the user configuration and thedecision template are combined to generate the configured decisionservice.

The configured decision service receives, from a client computer, inputfor each of the configurable decision elements. Based on the receivedinput, the decision data is generated by the configured decisionservice. The generated decision data is transmitted to the clientcomputer.

In some variations, one or more of the following features can be presentin any combination.

A consistency check can be performed that verifies that the configureddecision service does not violate at least one predetermined rule. Anerror message can be generated describing the violation of thepredetermined rule and provided to a user via a graphical userinterface.

The configuration package can be received by the deployment server froma remote computing system. The configured decision service can betransmitted to a remote computing system.

The configurable decision element in the framework can be updated, inresponse to the artifacts received by the configured decision service,to correspond to the received artifacts.

The input can be received by at least one call to the client computerrunning a web service.

Implementations of the current subject matter can include, but are notlimited to, methods consistent with the descriptions provided herein aswell as articles that comprise a tangibly embodied machine-readablemedium operable to cause one or more machines (e.g., computers, etc.) toresult in operations implementing one or more of the described features.Similarly, computer systems are also described that may include one ormore processors and one or more memories coupled to the one or moreprocessors. A memory, which can include a computer-readable storagemedium, may include, encode, store, or the like one or more programsthat cause one or more processors to perform one or more of theoperations described herein. Computer implemented methods consistentwith one or more implementations of the current subject matter can beimplemented by one or more data processors residing in a singlecomputing system or multiple computing systems. Such multiple computingsystems can be connected and can exchange data and/or commands or otherinstructions or the like via one or more connections, including but notlimited to a connection over a network (e.g. the Internet, a wirelesswide area network, a local area network, a wide area network, a wirednetwork, or the like), via a direct connection between one or more ofthe multiple computing systems, etc.

DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute apart of this specification, show certain aspects of the subject matterdisclosed herein and, together with the description, help explain someof the principles associated with the disclosed implementations. In thedrawings,

FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating a system integrating a userconfiguration into a configuration package to be used with a decisiontemplate;

FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating the configuration package containing aset of artifacts;

FIG. 3 is a process flow diagram illustrating multiple configurationspackages integrated into a decision template;

FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating a configuration package configuring aframework for generating decision data by a decision service.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The details of one or more variations of the subject matter describedherein are set forth in the accompanying drawings. The current subjectmatter describes using configuration packages to configure, by a user, astatic computer framework. By using one or more configuration packagestailored to a specific application or task, this allows the framework tobe reused with no change in the underlying programming code.

FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating a system 100 integrating a userconfiguration 110 into a configuration package 120 to be used with adecision template 130. User configurations 110 can be used withdifferent configuration packages 120, which are then integrated into thedecision template 130 in order to generate a configured decision service140. However, in the illustrated case, the decision template 130 is notaltered or customized by the user. Only the configuration package 120 orthe user configuration 110 changes from application to application. Thedecision template 130 can be, for example, a model, business program,manufacturing program, software development program, decision managementprogram, etc.

The configuration package 120 can be used with the decision template 130without having to alter the code of the underlying decision template130. In one implementation, the configuration package 120 can be apreset code package that does not require user input. In anotherimplementation, the configuration package 120 can require limited inputfrom the user, e.g. the user configuration 110, but still not requireany code changes to either the configuration package 120 or the decisiontemplate 130.

For example, a user wishes to use the decision template 130 for aparticular application. The user can download the configuration package120 to the computer and install it. Then, the user can be prompted forquestions to allow the configuration package 120 to interface with thedecision template 130, e.g. what kind of application, details on thejob, etc. After the decision template 130 has been interfaced with theconfiguration package 120 the application can then run seamlesslywithout the user having had to customize the decision template 130.There can be any number of user configurations 110 and configurationpackages 120, or any combination thereof, interfaced with the decisiontemplate 130.

FIG. 2 is a diagram 200 illustrating a configuration package 120containing a set of artifacts. The configuration package 120 can containa set of artifacts that allow the configuration package 120 to interfacewith the decision template 130. The artifacts can be models, libraries,labels, etc. as described below. There can be any number or combinationof artifacts in the configuration package 120 and the examples below arenot intended to limit the number or type of artifacts used with theconfiguration package 120. The artifacts can be in a number of dataformats, for example, XML, SRL, FSML, XSD, DB strings, MODEL BUILDERPROJECTS, BIRST files, PDF, etc.

In one implementation, there can be an input object model 204 includedwith the configuration package 120. The input object model 204 candefine the entities made available to decision services, such ascustomer, account, transaction, or in other words the entity of focus,as well as the data elements that comprise them. The definition of“account” can be different for retail banking and, for example, telecomor healthcare or airlines, etc. The input object model 204 for anorigination's configuration package 120 can include an application, notan account (though in other implementations it can also include accountsfor the cases where the applicant already has accounts with theinstitution). The entity of focus is dependent on the domain, and so itcan be stored as data inside the configuration package 120, and is nothard-referenced in the code or out-of-the-box data repository structure.The input object model 204 can be stored as an XML (Extensible Mark-upLanguage) file, an industry standard method of defining data.

In one implementation, there can be a variable library 208 included withthe configuration package 120. Domain-specific solutions requiretargeted variables that will also depend on the input object model 204.Some variables are standard and can be contained in the configurationpackage 120, and the balance of the library can be user definable, wherethe user can enter his/her own code through the UI. Variables can alsobe imported and exported as needed. The variable library will bedifferent for different configuration packages 120. For example,revolving account management will have different needs, terminology anddata than telecom. The former can have variables such as average accountbalance last 6 months, or maximum account delinquency last 12 months,and the latter can have average long distance minutes last 3 months,etc. Since the variable library 208 can be part of the configurationpackage 120, when users import the configuration package 120, they cantherefore get a domain-specific variable library 208 that matches theinput object model 204 (which is also in the configuration package 120).The variable library 208 can be stored as SRL, or “STRUCTURED RULELANGUAGE,” a proprietary language of FAIR ISSAC CORPORATION.

In one implementation, the user configuration 110 can includeexclusions. Similar to variables, exclusion logic is a test on the valueof a variable (e.g. if Variable A<5 then exclude; otherwise don't).Exclusions in a revolving account management configuration package 120can include time on books <12 months, or account is more than 3 cyclesdelinquent, whereas in a telecom configuration package 120, it might beaccount age <12 months, or service is suspended, etc. Exclusions can bestored as SRL.

In one implementation, there can be inclusions included with the userconfiguration 110. Inclusions are similar to exclusions, above, onlybased upon variable analysis the variable is included rather thanexcluded.

By way of introduction to 220, 224, 228, and 232, decision areaparameters are holders for values that the decision process will use tomake the decision. They are not input fields, but they are indirectlyassociated with the entity of focus (account, framework, etc.). Theentire configuration package 120 is dependent on the entity of focus andthe business problem being solved. For example, two configurationpackages 120 in banking can have “account” as their entity of focus, butone might focus on checking accounts whereas the other might focus oncredit cards. Each can have different decision area parameters. Thereare parameters provided at different levels:

-   -   decision area (so the values are set when you know what decision        area you are doing, e.g. credit line management, fee waiver        management, etc.),    -   strategy (so the values are set when the strategy is set in the        coarse classing step),    -   action set (so the values are set in the fine classing step).

These parameters can be implemented in decision frameworks withoutconfiguration packages 120, or can be hard-wired into the frameworkcode. The overarching idea is that there are some parameters you want toset at each of these three levels. They are all optional, and arereferenced in the post-strategy decision area process, described below.

The configuration package 120 can include the labels for these things,but not the values themselves. The configuration package 120 can contain“cushion amount” and “over limit tolerance,” etc., which are usefulparameters to have when making an authorization decision, and“application cutoff age” is a useful parameter for an originationsdecision, etc., but the configuration package 120 does not have tospecify what the actual percentage (or whatever) should be set to. Theactual values can be set by the clients, and depend, for example, on howaggressive they are (or other factors coming from their strategicanalyst roles) and can be subject to adjustment through time as part ofchampion/challenger testing. Clients set these parameters in theframework's user interface, and they are configuration, notcustomization.

In one implementation, there can be action labels 220 included with theconfiguration package 120. Labels can be used to label fields/valuesspecific to a business problem or domain. Labels can also infuseproprietary software into configuration packages 120 by making mostcommon actions and decision input parameters required to solve abusiness problem available and apparent to the user. For example, in aconfiguration package 120 for post-hospital discharge decisions, actionlabels 220 might reflect: nurse visits or doctor visit. In a debtcollection setting, an action might recommend blocking the account, orrouting to a collections queue. Labels can be stored as plain text inCSV (Comma Separated Values) format. The general features of labelsdescribed above can also apply to other types of labels describedthroughout the framework.

In one implementation, there can be decision area parameter labels 224included with the configuration package 120. The decision areaparameters, selected by the decision area parameter labels 224, arevalues made available to the decision process based on the decision areacurrently in process. Configuration packages 120 can contain multipledecision areas. For example, the configuration package 120 for depositaccount decisions in retail banking may include decision areas foroverdraft pay/no-pay decisions, fee waiver management, and deposit holdsmanagement, whereas the configuration package 120 for telecom mayinclude decision areas for cross-sell, pricing and fee structure,account renewals, etc.

In one implementation, there can be strategy parameter labels 228included with the configuration package 120. Strategy parameters,selected by the strategy parameter labels 228, are values made availableto the decision process based on the strategy assigned to the entity offocus in the overall decision flow processing. Strategy assignment canoccur in a coarse-classing preliminary decision step.

In one implementation, there can be action set parameter labels 232included with the configuration package 120. Action set parameters canbe values made available to the decision process based on the action setassigned in the executed strategy. Action sets can be assigned as asubsequent fine-classing decision step.

In one implementation, there can be scoring models 236 included with theconfiguration package 120. Whether and which predictive scoring modelsare delivered with initial installs is subject to licensing, so scoringmodels are optionally part of the configuration package 120. Scoringmodels 236 can be specific to a domain or business problem and can bechosen to include with the configuration package 120. In oneimplementation, scoring models 236 can be stored in the configurationpackage 120 as MODEL BUILDER/BLAZE ADVISOR projects, which is a FICOproprietary format. Models may also be stored in PMML (predictiveModeling Mark-Up Language), an industry standard specification of XMLused to represent analytic scoring models.

In one implementation, there can be out-of-the-box reports 240 includedwith the configuration package 120. The out-of-the-box reports 240, canenable users to monitor and evaluate performance of the strategiessupported by the configuration package 120 and the decision template130. They can be generated per industry vertical and included in theconfiguration package 120. Out-of-the-box reports 240 can be stored inany format particular to the reporting package integrated into thedecision template 130, for example BIRST, JASPER, or SAP BUSINESSOBJECTS, etc.

In one implementation, there can be a post-strategy decision areaprocess 244 included with the configuration package 120. Following theexecution of a strategy, further domain and business problem-specificitems can be addressed the post-strategy decision area process 244 ofthe configuration package 120. By this stage in the process, thedecision flow has processed general and decision area exclusions,strategy assignment (coarse classing), generated scores and other neededvariables, etc., and performed fine segmentation in the strategy tree.At this point, some decision areas have specific logic that completesthe decision processing, for example, credit facilities has logic tocalculate the various limits, authorizations determines theaccept-or-decline decision, etc. This logic can be stored in theconfiguration package 120 as SRL.

In one implementation, there can be a documentation set 248 includedwith the configuration package 120. Specific formats will be establishedin the development cycle and at the design level, but each package willhave the documentation set 248 as a standard set of documents associatedwith and zipped up with the configuration package 120. The documentationset 248 can be in any format, e.g. MICROSOFT WORD, ADOBE PDF, etc., anddescribe the elements contained for the end-users.

In one implementation, there can be package description XML 252 includedwith the configuration package 120. Each configuration package 120 willhave the package description XML 252 document and schema associated withit that will contain meta-data about the configuration package 120 suchas domain, date-of-issue, versioning of each element, number anddescription of each element, etc. The package description XML 252 can beused in package features such as import and export, and may also beuseful for customer support.

FIG. 3 is a process flow diagram 300 illustrating multipleconfigurations packages 120 integrated into the decision template 130.In the implementation shown, the configuration packages 120 can beaccumulated into a set of configuration packages 310 that include, forexample, input object models, libraries, etc. Then, the configurationpackages 120 can be integrated with the decision template 130, to form aconfigured service decision 140. In the example shown in FIG. 3, theconfiguration packages 120 are added to a Strategy Director framework toform the configured Strategy Director.

At 320, users can configure strategies, score models, and otherparameters. Users can also view reports or perform other operations ortasks.

At 330, the service can be published to another program, in this casethe DECISION MANAGEMENT PLATFORM (DMP). Details regarding DMP can befound, for example, in U.S. Pat. App. Ser. No. 61/928,951, the contentsof which are hereby fully incorporated by reference.

At 340, during runtime of the DMP, a decision service template 342 canbe loaded into a decision service project 344 to render a decisionservice 346.

At 350, batch drivers can be loaded for use by the DMP during 340.

At 360, a client calling system can be used to contact clients forimplementation of decisions reached by the DMP.

At 370, the results of the decisions made with the DMP can be sent tothe ANALYTIC DATA MART (ADM). The ADM is a data repository that isoutput by processing customer data through the aggregated decisiontemplate 130 configured with the configuration packages 120. The ADMcontains the values calculated by the system on all relevant artifactsof the configuration package 120, e.g. input data, variables, etc.

At 380, reports from the ADM can be put back into the DMP for later useby the DMP or for using configuring the decision template 130, asdescribed in 320, above.

FIG. 4 is a diagram 400 illustrating a configuration package 120configuring a decision template 130 for generating decision data 490 bya configured decision service 140. The configured decision service 140can be called from, or exported to, a client computer 480 in order toprovide decision data 490 based on what specifically the configureddecision service 140 is asked to analyze. Once the configured decisionservice 140 is configured by the configuration package 420 and the userconfiguration 110 to accept certain types of data and make certainlogical decisions, the configured decision service 140 can acceptspecific input, for example from a client computer 480 and providedecision data 490.

As one example, a simple decision service could determine if a bank feeshould be waived. The decision template 130 for making a decision aboutthe fee could be based on two elements, with each element having aweighting depending on the type of element chosen. Accordingly, thedecision template 130 could have two configurable decision elements andtwo non-configurable elements (the weightings). A user could implementthe configuration package 420 to select, via the user configuration 110,that the two configurable decision elements are: (1) an existing accountbalance and (2) the amount of the fee. Also, for example, thenon-configurable decision elements (the weightings) could be determinedbased on the configurable decision elements selected. Once configured,the decision service 450 could accept input from a client computer 480that specifies a specific account balance and a specific amount of thefee. The decision service 450 could then, using the configured framework460, generate the decision data 490 (waive or not waive) based on thespecific input given to the configured framework 460.

As shown in FIG. 4, a configuration package 420 can include any numberof artifacts 430 or references to artifacts 430 from an artifact libraryin a configuration database. As described above, the artifacts 430 canrepresent a data type (or input object model), logical operations orquantities that have to be determined at run-time (variables), scoringmodels, etc. The artifacts 430 can accordingly correspond to an input oran input type received by the configured decision service 140 from anexternal source, such as a client computer 480.

A decision service factory 450 can receive the configuration package 420from within the deployment server 410 or from a remote computing systemseparate from the deployment server 410. The decision service factory450 can be a code module that accepts the artifacts 430 in theconfiguration package 420 and distributes or transmits the artifacts 430to the appropriate location in the decision template 460. As discussedabove, the configuration package 420 can be configured based onuser-generated input and/or the user configuration 110, furtherconfiguring the configured decision service 140. The decision servicefactory 450 can also receive the decision template 130 and the userconfiguration 110. The user configuration can specify a parameter, forexample a particular feature, in one or more of the artifacts 430. Theartifacts 430 specified by the configuration package 120 can be combinedwith the user configuration 110 and the decision template 130 togenerate the configured decision service 140. The decision servicefactory 450 and the configured decision service 140 can be located inany computing system, for example, in a deployment server 410 thatdistributes configured decision services 140, in a remote system, etc.

As noted above, the decision template 130 can contain any number ofconfigurable decision elements 462 and non-configurable decisionelements 464. The simple linear sequence shown in FIG. 4 is intended tobe exemplary only. The order of the decision elements can vary and therecan be any number of decision elements connected to a given decisionelement.

In one implementation, once the configured decision service 140 iscompleted, there can be a consistency check to ensure that theconfiguration of the configured decision service 140 is consistent ordoes not violate any predetermined rules. For example, the consistencycheck could determine if, as a result of the user configuration 110applied to the configuration package 120, the configured framework 460would enter into a loop or have an invalid output when calculating thedecision data 490. If a violation is detected, an error message can begenerated that describes the violation. The error message can then betransmitted to another computer, displayed on a graphical userinterface, or otherwise communicated to one or more users or connectedcomputing systems.

The configured decision service 140 can receive, from a client computer480, input for the configurable decision elements. The input can bespecific data of the type that is required by the configured decisionservice 140. For example, if a configured element is an account balance,the input for that configured element could be a numerical valuecorresponding to the account balance for a particular account.

Once the input has been received by the configured decision service 140,the configured decision service 140 can generate decision data 490 basedon the received input, and the non-configurable decision elements 464.The decision data 490 can be, for example, a binary “yes/no” decision, ascore, a probability, a recommendation, a combination of a number ofsuch entities, etc. The generated decision data 490 can then betransmitted to the client computer 480 or any number of connectedcomputing systems.

In one implementation, the configured decision service 140 or thedecision template 130 can be transferred to a remote computing system.Such publishing of data can enable the remote computing system tolocally implement the configured decision service 140 without requiringa connection to the deployment server 410.

In another implementation, the configurable decision elements can beupdated in response to changes in artifacts 430 received by the decisionservice factory 440. The updating can be based on a user optimizing theartifacts 430 that go into the decision template 130 in order to improveaccuracy of generated decisions.

In yet another implementation, the input can be received by calls to theclient computer 480 as it runs a web service. In this way, both theconfiguration package 120, and the input originating from the clientcomputer 480, can be managed by one or more client-side computingsystems. Also, the web service can enable use of the decision service450 via graphical user interfaces, browsers, and so on, from a singlenetworked computer.

One or more aspects or features of the subject matter described hereincan be realized in digital electronic circuitry, integrated circuitry,specially designed framework 460 specific integrated circuits (ASICs),field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) computer hardware, firmware,software, and/or combinations thereof. These various aspects or featurescan include implementation in one or more computer programs that areexecutable and/or interpretable on a programmable system including atleast one programmable processor, which can be special or generalpurpose, coupled to receive data and instructions from, and to transmitdata and instructions to, a storage system, at least one input device,and at least one output device. The programmable system or computingsystem may include clients and servers. A client and server aregenerally remote from each other and typically interact through acommunication network. The relationship of client and server arises byvirtue of computer programs running on the respective computers andhaving a client-server relationship to each other.

These computer programs, which can also be referred to as programs,software, software frameworks, frameworks, components, or code, includemachine instructions for a programmable processor, and can beimplemented in a high-level procedural language, an object-orientedprogramming language, a functional programming language, a logicalprogramming language, and/or in assembly/machine language. As usedherein, the term “machine-readable medium” refers to any computerprogram product, apparatus and/or device, such as for example magneticdiscs, optical disks, memory, and Programmable Logic Devices (PLDs),used to provide machine instructions and/or data to a programmableprocessor, including a machine-readable medium that receives machineinstructions as a machine-readable signal. The term “machine-readablesignal” refers to any signal used to provide machine instructions and/ordata to a programmable processor. The machine-readable medium can storesuch machine instructions non-transitorily, such as for example as woulda non-transient solid-state memory or a magnetic hard drive or anyequivalent storage medium. The machine-readable medium can alternativelyor additionally store such machine instructions in a transient manner,such as for example as would a processor cache or other random accessmemory associated with one or more physical processor cores.

To provide for interaction with a user, one or more aspects or featuresof the subject matter described herein can be implemented on a computerhaving a display device, such as for example a cathode ray tube (CRT) ora liquid crystal display (LCD) or a light emitting diode (LED) monitorfor displaying information to the user and a keyboard and a pointingdevice, such as for example a mouse or a trackball, by which the usermay provide input to the computer. Other kinds of devices can be used toprovide for interaction with a user as well. For example, feedbackprovided to the user can be any form of sensory feedback, such as forexample visual feedback, auditory feedback, or tactile feedback; andinput from the user may be received in any form, including, but notlimited to, acoustic, speech, or tactile input. Other possible inputdevices include, but are not limited to, touch screens or othertouch-sensitive devices such as single or multi-point resistive orcapacitive trackpads, voice recognition hardware and software, opticalscanners, optical pointers, digital image capture devices and associatedinterpretation software, and the like.

In the descriptions above and in the claims, phrases such as “at leastone of” or “one or more of” may occur followed by a conjunctive list ofelements or features. The term “and/or” may also occur in a list of twoor more elements or features. Unless otherwise implicitly or explicitlycontradicted by the context in which it used, such a phrase is intendedto mean any of the listed elements or features individually or any ofthe recited elements or features in combination with any of the otherrecited elements or features. For example, the phrases “at least one ofA and B;” “one or more of A and B;” and “A and/or B” are each intendedto mean “A alone, B alone, or A and B together.” A similarinterpretation is also intended for lists including three or more items.For example, the phrases “at least one of A, B, and C;” “one or more ofA, B, and C;” and “A, B, and/or C” are each intended to mean “A alone, Balone, C alone, A and B together, A and C together, B and C together, orA and B and C together.” Use of the term “based on,” above and in theclaims is intended to mean, “based at least in part on,” such that anunrecited feature or element is also permissible.

The subject matter described herein can be embodied in systems,apparatus, methods, and/or articles depending on the desiredconfiguration. The implementations set forth in the foregoingdescription do not represent all implementations consistent with thesubject matter described herein. Instead, they are merely some examplesconsistent with aspects related to the described subject matter.Although a few variations have been described in detail above, othermodifications or additions are possible. In particular, further featuresand/or variations can be provided in addition to those set forth herein.For example, the implementations described above can be directed tovarious combinations and subcombinations of the disclosed featuresand/or combinations and subcombinations of several further featuresdisclosed above. In addition, the logic flows depicted in theaccompanying figures and/or described herein do not necessarily requirethe particular order shown, or sequential order, to achieve desirableresults. Other implementations may be within the scope of the followingclaims.

What is claimed is:
 1. A computer implemented method comprising:receiving, by a configuration package, user-generated input thatconfigures a decision service to generate decision data, theconfiguration package comprising at least one artifact, theuser-generated input selecting the at least one artifact from anartifact library in a configuration database; generating a configureddecision service, the generating comprising: receiving, by a decisionservice factory, the configuration package; receiving, by the decisionservice factory, a decision template comprising at least oneconfigurable decision element and at least one non-configurable decisionelement; receiving, by the decision service factory, at least one userconfiguration specifying a parameter in the corresponding at least oneartifact; and combining the at least one artifact from the configurationpackage and the at least one user configuration with the decisiontemplate to generate the configured decision service; verifying that theconfigured decision service does not violate at least one predeterminedrule; and receiving, by the configured decision service from a clientcomputer, input for at least one configurable decision element, inresponse to verifying that the configured decision service does notviolate the at least one predetermined rule.
 2. The computer-implementedmethod of claim 1, wherein the combining does not alter software code ofthe decision template.
 3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1,wherein the input is received by the configured decision service fromthe client computer, in response to a consistency check indicating thatthe configured decision service does not violate the at least onepredetermined rule.
 4. The computer-implemented method of claim 3,further comprising: generating, in response to the consistency checkindicating that the configured decision service violates the at leastone predetermined rule, an error message describing the violation of theat least one predetermined rule; and providing the error message to auser via a graphical user interface.
 5. The computer-implemented methodof claim 1, further comprising generating, by the configured decisionservice, the decision data based at least on the received input.
 6. Thecomputer-implemented method of claim 5, further comprising transmitting,to the client computer, the generated decision data.
 7. Thecomputer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the configurationpackage is received by a deployment server from a remote computingsystem.
 8. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, furthercomprising transmitting the configured decision service to a remotecomputing system.
 9. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, furthercomprising updating, in response to the artifacts received by theconfigured decision service, the at least one configurable decisionelement in the framework to correspond to the received artifacts. 10.The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the input isreceived by at least one call to the client computer running a webservice.
 11. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein theconfiguration package includes a package description document and schemawith meta-data about the configuration package.
 12. Thecomputer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the metadata includes atleast one of domain, date-of-issue, versioning data, and number anddescription of one or more configurable decision elements.
 13. Acomputer implemented system comprising one or more processor configuredfor: receiving user-generated input that configures a decision serviceto generate decision data via a configuration package comprising atleast one artifact, the user-generated input selecting the at least oneartifact from an artifact library in a configuration database;generating a configured decision service, the generating comprising:receiving the configuration package; receiving a decision templatecomprising at least one configurable decision element and at least onenon-configurable decision element; receiving at least one userconfiguration specifying a parameter in the corresponding at least oneartifact; and combining the at least one artifact from the configurationpackage and the at least one user configuration with the decisiontemplate to generate the configured decision service; verifying that theconfigured decision service does not violate at least one predeterminedrule; and receiving input for at least one configurable decisionelement, in response to verifying that the configured decision servicedoes not violate the at least one predetermined rule.
 14. Thecomputer-implemented system of claim 13, wherein the input is receivedby the configured decision service from the client computer, in responseto a consistency check indicating that the configured decision servicedoes not violate the at least one predetermined rule.
 15. Thecomputer-implemented system of claim 13, wherein the decision data isgenerated based at least on the received input.
 16. Thecomputer-implemented system of claim 13, wherein the generated decisiondata is transmitted to the client computer.
 17. The computer-implementedsystem of claim 16, wherein in response to the consistency checkindicating that the configured decision service violates the at leastone predetermined rule, an error message is generated describing theviolation of the at least one predetermined rule; and the error messageis provided to a user via a graphical user interface.
 18. Thecomputer-implemented system of claim 13, wherein the configurationpackage is received by a deployment server from a remote computingsystem.
 19. The computer-implemented system of claim 13, the configureddecision service is transmitted to a remote computing system.
 20. Acomputer program product comprising a non-transitory machine-readablemedium storing instructions that, when executed by at least oneprogrammable processor, cause the at least one programmable processor toperform operations comprising: receiving user-generated input thatconfigures a decision service to generate decision data via aconfiguration package comprising at least one artifact, theuser-generated input selecting the at least one artifact from anartifact library in a configuration database; generating a configureddecision service, the generating comprising: receiving the configurationpackage; receiving a decision template comprising at least oneconfigurable decision element and at least one non-configurable decisionelement; receiving at least one user configuration specifying aparameter in the corresponding at least one artifact; and combining theat least one artifact from the configuration package and the at leastone user configuration with the decision template to generate theconfigured decision service; verifying that the configured decisionservice does not violate at least one predetermined rule; and receivinginput for at least one configurable decision element, in response toverifying that the configured decision service does not violate the atleast one predetermined rule.